InclusionEdge
Measurement artefact Impact stage

Impact Snapshot

The one-page before-and-after proof asset produced at the close of every engagement, weighted toward behaviour rather than satisfaction.

The problem it solves

Training evaluation usually stops at whether participants enjoyed the session. The Impact Snapshot reports movement in observable behaviour at follow-up, and states plainly what cannot be attributed to the programme.

Illustrative sample. The structure, indicators and attribution language are exactly as delivered. The figures are placeholders — they are not from a client engagement, and we will not present them as though they were.
Impact Snapshot

CARE Essentials — Operations division

Cohort of 48 · Baseline, post-session and six-week follow-up

Behaviour indicators

Percentage of respondents reporting the behaviour occurred in the preceding two weeks. Kirkpatrick Level 3.

Manager follows verbal briefing with written summary

Baseline
22%
Post
71%
6 weeks
64%

Adjustment request acknowledged within two working days

Baseline
38%
Post
82%
6 weeks
77%

Team member reports knowing how to raise a support need

Baseline
31%
Post
74%
6 weeks
69%

Meeting agenda circulated in advance

Baseline
44%
Post
86%
6 weeks
81%

What held

Written follow-up after verbal briefing showed the largest movement and retained most of it at six weeks. Teams that adopted it as a default practice — rather than as an individual accommodation — retained it more consistently.

What slipped

All indicators declined between the post-session and six-week measures. This is expected and is the reason the follow-up pulse exists: a post-session reading alone would have overstated the result by a material margin.

Attribution — stated plainly

  • This is a single cohort with no control group. Movement is associated with the programme; it is not demonstrated to be caused by it.
  • A divisional restructure was announced in week three of the measurement window. Its effect on these indicators is unknown and cannot be separated out.
  • Self-reported behaviour over-reports relative to observed behaviour. Treat absolute values as indicative and movement as the meaningful signal.
  • No return-on-investment figure is presented. A six-week window on one cohort does not support one, and any figure offered would be manufactured.
InclusionEdge · Impact Snapshot Where intent meets lived reality.

The Impact Snapshot exists because proof-hungry buyers are right to be sceptical. Its credibility comes from the attribution section as much as the indicators — a report that claims less is worth more.

Other instruments

Diagnostic instrument

Task-Level Job Audit

Open Diagnostic framework

The Seam Map

Open Learning artefact

CARE Scenario Walkthrough

Open